Free PCB calculator

Coplanar waveguide (CPW and grounded CPW) calculator

Characteristic impedance of a trace with ground copper on both sides, with or without a ground plane underneath. Grounded CPW is common for RF traces to antennas and connectors.

How it is calculated

Model. Conformal mapping (Wen; Ghione and Naldi). With k1 = w/(w+2s): for CPW without a bottom ground, εeff = 1 + (εr−1)/2 · [K(k2)/K(k2′)] / [K(k1)/K(k1′)] with k2 = sinh(πw/4h)/sinh(π(w+2s)/4h), and Z0 = 30π/√εeff · K(k1′)/K(k1).

For grounded CPW, k3 = tanh(πw/4h)/tanh(π(w+2s)/4h) and Z0 = 60π/√εeff / [K(k1)/K(k1′) + K(k3)/K(k3′)].

Copper thickness. Gupta's correction widens the strip and narrows the gap by Δ = 1.25t/π · (1 + ln(4πw/t)) and lowers the effective dielectric constant, because more of the field sits in the air-filled gaps.

Accuracy. About 3 % against a 2D field solver for 1 oz copper. The side grounds are assumed wide, and grounded CPW needs a row of stitching vias along both edges.

References

  1. C. P. Wen, “Coplanar Waveguide: A Surface Strip Transmission Line Suitable for Nonreciprocal Gyromagnetic Device Applications”, IEEE Trans. MTT, vol. 17, no. 12, 1969.
  2. G. Ghione, C. Naldi, “Analytical Formulas for Coplanar Lines in Hybrid and Monolithic MICs”, Electronics Letters, vol. 20, no. 4, 1984.
  3. K. C. Gupta, R. Garg, I. Bahl, P. Bhartia, Microstrip Lines and Slotlines, 2nd ed., Artech House, 1996, chapter 7.

Questions

When should I use grounded CPW instead of microstrip?

When the trace has to be narrow on a thick board, or when you want the field tightly confined and well isolated, for example from an RF chip to an antenna connector.

How far apart should the stitching vias be?

A common rule is less than a tenth of a wavelength at the highest frequency of interest, and close to the gap edge.

Other calculators